Home → Editors and Authors Benefit from Librarian Involvement in Peer Review Citation List

Editors and Authors Benefit from Librarian Involvement in Peer Review Citation List

By Janene Batten, EdD, Holly Grossetta Nardini, MLS, Kate Nyhan, MLIS

INANE 2021 Poster Citation List and Resources

  1. Ioannidis JPA. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Milbank Quarterly. 2016;94(3):485-514.
  2. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71-72.
  3. Moosapour H, Saeidifard F, Aalaa M, Soltani A, Larijani B. The rationale behind systematic reviews in clinical medicine: a conceptual framework. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders. 2021;20(1):919-929.
  4. Greenhalgh T, Malterud K. Systematic reviews for policymaking: Muddling through. American Journal of Public Health. 2017;107(1):97-99.
  5. Gao Y, Cai Y, Yang K, et al. Methodological and reporting quality in non-Cochrane systematic review updates could be improved: a comparative study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2020;119:36-46.
  6. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ. 2021;372.
  7. Page MJ, Altman DG, Shamseer L, et al. Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;94:8-18.
  8. Rethlefsen, M. L., Farrell, A. M., Osterhaus Trzasko, L. C., & Brigham, T. J. (2015, Jun). Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6), 617-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
  9. Rethlefsen, M. L., Murad, M. H., & Livingston, E. H. (2014, Sep 10). Engaging medical librarians to improve the quality of review articles. JAMA, 312(10), 999-1000. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.9263
  10. Grossetta Nardini HK, Batten J, Funaro MC, et al. Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2019;4:23.
  11. Boston, A. PiePlate: Proposing a visual peer-review overlay service. 2020 Dec 19 [cited 2021 Jun 29]; Available from: https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:34079/. 2020; https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:34079/. Accessed July 2, 2021.
  12. Dinakaran D, Anaka M, Mackey JR. Proposal for ‘segmented peer review’ of multidisciplinary papers. Translational Oncology. 2021;14(2).
  13. Nyhan K, Nardini HKG. Evidence synthesis papers would benefit from segmented peer review. Translational Oncology. 2021;14(5).
     

Where to Find Librarians